well that’s why I became a physicists because I wanted to know all about matter and anti-matter. We don’t have all the answers and there’s plenty to work on but we do have lots of answers. For instance we know a lot about anti-matter. At CERN at the moment they are making anti-hydrogen atoms which is really amazing. They are then going to see whether matter and anti-matter behave a little bit differently. The experiment is called Alpha if you want to google it.
Yes! Yes I really would like to know all about it, especially because it would earn me a Nobel Prize, hehe.
Finding differences between anti-matter and matter is one of the great problems of modern science. Theoretically, anti-matter is a sort of reflection of matter: same mass, but almost all the other fundamental properties are reversed.
That’s a problem with this though: at the beginning of our universe, huge amounts of matter and anti-matter were created. However more matter needs to have been created than anti-matter, otherwise it all would have been annihilated and we wouldn’t exist!
So here’s the conundrum. The laws of physics have to treat matter and anti-matter differently, to create the matter/anti-matter imbalance at the start of our universe. But anti-matter is a near perfect reflection of matter, and so by definition *shouldn’t* be affected by the laws of physics in a different way to matter.
The secret lies in the fact that anti-matter and matter have very ever-so-slight differences in their fundamental properties, but finding these differences is extremely difficult and, as I said earlier, is one of the great problems of modern physics.
Sure, who would say no to knowing everything? 🙂
Would knowing everything about matter and antimatter also include being able to predict which lottery balls end up in the slots? Because then I am definitely onboard.
Plus, yeah, also scientifically it would be very good, but Tim and Zachary pretty much explained why.
Comments