Future. Definitely.
Here’s why: we know a lot more about the past than about the future. If curiosity is what I’d be traveling for, then the future is a lot more interesting.
Also, I don’t think the 18th century is such a good time to be in. Life was hard, except for a few lucky people of noble birth. Hard labour, famine, oppression by monarchs and churches, diseases. No wonder people started revolutions back then (such as in France, and the soon-to-be USA). We are leading a much better life now (though fortunately still only a minority of mankind!).
In the future, things might of course be a lot worse if something goes wrong between now and then, but at least we don’t already know it’s bad. 🙂
Hi, nice question. For me, it’s the future because for sure we will know a lot more about the universe and so I will love finding out the answers to the difficult questions we have now. Also we know quite a lot about what happened 300 years ago but we know nothing about what things will be like 300 in the future. It could be a risk though, maybe humans will be in a bad way. Perhaps we will have gone backwards….it’s a risk I’ll take..
Well, in 1713 there was no antibiotics, dentistry or modern medicine. Still, even if health and money and things like that weren’t a concern, I’d take my chances in the future. I already know what happens in the past! I’d love to know what we get up to in 300 years. No doubt they’d get up to a lot of stuff I’d consider weird or unpleasant (imagine yanking a person from the 1700s into the present day, what on earth would they think of us?), but I would be too curious to pass up such an opportunity.
Comments